AFUL Performer 5 first impressions

AFUL Performer 5 first impressions:

Purchased a pre-international release unit for myself to test the waters, and these are my thoughts on the Performer 5. Faceplate design should be in a different colour for the international release but the sound qualities remain the same according to AFUL.

Lows
- Subbass rumble is real, well extended
- Full, impactful but never overpowering
- Decay is fairly standard, nothing too special which means crowded tracks can make the P5 struggle in the subbass region (e.g. Gate OP 1)
- Texture and detail are above average, with clear separation of sub-midbass, and with no midbass tuck
- Overall, satisfying level of detail and rumble with minor flaws

Mids
- Nothing much to fault tonally
- Neutral-warm, with midrange sounding much fuller than other sets that faithfully follow harman
- No shoutiness in vocals, not vocal-forward
- Well separated from bass region, with above average clarity
- Equal representation of male and female vocals in the mix
- Overall, full and somewhat clear midrange, with my only nitpick being I wished the vocals were just a tad more forward since they don't sound thin

Upper midrange
- One of the few IEMs in this price bracket that does not force the 3khz/4khz peak
- Full bodied cymbals and high hats, minus the sibilance (makes Acacia by Bump of Chicken actually listenable)

Treble
- Neutral with some added spice for harmonics
- Non-fatiguing listen
- BA implementation for this region is impressive even without taking into account price point (beats 80% of the blunt EST ones)
- Detailed and clear

Technical performance
- Average soundstage, putting it behind the B2, but ahead of the Lokahi
- Accurate imaging, no issue with handling orchestral tracks
- Coherency is good for a hybrid set, though as with all other 1DD + nBA sets, the DD is somewhat slower than the BAs
- Detail retrieval is good, especially in the upper midrange and lower treble

Conclusion
The Performer 5 excels in tonal balance, detail level, dynamics, imaging at this price range. While the sound leans neutral-warm in general, there is little sacrifice in the technical performance. If you want a balanced beast at USD220, the Performer 5 should get consideration. Yes it's pretty AwFUL naming sense, but this gets a solid recommendation at the price.

Rating: B+ 

Comments

End of 2022 thoughts and buying guide for IEMs released this year

2022 is about to draw to a close and the IEM scene isn't about to slow down any time soon. On the contrary, it seems like companies have picked up the pace on creating well-tuned, value for money products that are both wallet-friendly and attractive for people looking for quality, portable sound. That said, the number of collaboration units that have been released in 2022 is astonishing. If we just talk about major reviewers and their units, here's a non-exhaustive list: 1. QKZ x HBB Khan (BGGA) 2. Letshuoer EJ07M Kinda Lava (BGGA) 3. Seeaudio Yume Midnight (Crinacle) 4. Tripowin Olina (BGGA) 5. Tripowin Olina SE (BGGA) 6. TRI x HBB Kai (BGGA) 7. Yanyin Mahina (BGGA) 8. Truthear Zero (Crinacle) 9. Salnotes Zero (Crinacle without the branding) 10. Dunu SA6 Ultra (Zeos...?) 11. Letshuoer Z12 (Zeos) 12. Tangzu Heyday (BGGA) 13. 7Hz Dioko (Crinacle) 14. Raptgo Hook X HBB (BGGA) You get the idea. The collaboration fatigue is real when literally a new product gets announced every

Tigerism Octave - The Tiger strikes back

Perhaps more known for the single-DD wonder - MiM Dark Magician, the company in question has also launched another single-DD model which is notably cheaper (about $160) yet arguably better build quality. Introducing the Tigerism Octave, a full-metal shell IEM with, you guessed it, tiger stripe designs on the faceplates. The very next thing you'll notice is how insanely THICC the stock cable is. The finishing and overall quality on both of these frankly put many mid-tier priced IEMs to shame. Admire the striped design -chef's kiss- Tigerism Octave, not sure if that is the serial number Sound quality Lows The lows are most certainly going to be the make or break portion of this IEM, because they are tuned to sound natural but sacrifices some detail in the process. What this means is that slower paced tracks sound great but faster tracks may not sound as clean as a multi-BA set up for example. The lows are meaty, with very good extension from subbass to midbass before a gentle

Moondrop Blessing 3 - A redemption arc?

Ever since the release of the Chu which ruled the the budget market for a grand total of 2 months, Moondrop has not been in the spotlight since. The long standing issue of Moondrop only having the Blessing2 and Blessing2 Dusk (not tuned completely by the company) as the mid-tier price entries pretty much meant that these products were competing with newer products that could offer more or similar for less. Coupled with mediocre or even subpar releases, alongside the company's tendency to overmarket to the anime-loving community, it was really difficult to recommend any of their under $500 products. And then the Blessing 3 came about - a hybrid 2DD + 4BA promising to improve upon the already decent DNA of the Blessing 2. There was no question, it was time to see if Moondrop can keep up with the other audio releases in such a fast-moving market. I was glad to see that there was not really a price difference between the Blessing 2 and Blessing 3, which meant it was a serious product t

shuwaudio

Search This Blog